Office utilisation rates have stabilised
Over 60% of occupiers stated that their office attendance had reached a steady state, up from 50% in 2023, indicating that firms have embraced flexible and/or hybrid working as a stable model. Some 32% of companies anticipate an increase in office usage over time, on par with the 34% who said the same in 2023.
By sector, financial companies have largely achieved a steady state of office attendance, with 71% of respondents indicating that this was the case, and only 25% expecting an uptick in usage. This trend is expected to stabilise in the coming year, contingent on a global economic recovery. Half of TMT sector respondents reported that their office attendance had stabilised, while the other half anticipate increased usage. While larger tech firms have optimised office utilisation, smaller startups are focused on expanding headcount, which sometimes leads to constraints on office space as they look to accommodate growth.
Figure 1. Acceptance of current state of office attendance by overall and selected industries
Note: N=71.
Source: CBRE Research, July 2024
Actual attendance is aligned with company expectations
Employer expectations for office attendance and employee behaviour are closely aligned. Employees in the region are showing slightly higher office attendance than what companies are requesting, suggesting a strong commitment to being present in the workplace and indicating a complete return to the office.
Some 70% of companies want their employees to attend the office at least three days a week, with 36% aiming to have their employees attend the office for a full five-day work week. Companies in mainland China have the highest expectations, with 69% expecting staff to be in the office five days per week.
Figure 2. Office attendance expectations and actual visits in a typical week
Note: N=122.
Source: CBRE Research, July 2024.
Resetting thinking about office utilisation
Corporates need to rethink how we measure and interpret office utilisation to increase the precision of estimating current and future space needs: Leading clients are using three utilisation metrics: peak, average, and trough.
Key utilisation questions to consider:
- If utilisation targets are set too high will that be a reason why people won’t come into the office?
- At what level of utilisation is an office full?
(data suggests around 85% for unassigned workplaces – if ambition is for people to sit where they want, with who they want)
- Consistent utilisation is the key – minimising the gap between peak and trough utilisation maintains workspace vibrancy – which in turn attracts people to the office.
- Is asymmetric space use a benefit rather than a problem? The workforce may prefer to have quiet days for focus and quiet chats and busy days to connect with people they don’t see so often.
Figure 3. Explaining the three key utilisation metrics (for illustration only)
Region outperforms but still opportunities to optimise workplace
The proportion of companies in Asia Pacific (43%) reporting a peak utilisation rate of 80% and above was higher than their counterparts in Europe (26%) and the U.S. (30%). Within the region, lower rates of utilisation were observed among TMT and professional services firms, which continue to adopt flexible working.
Most organisations target 80%-90% office utilisation, balancing vibrancy and optimisation while avoiding overcrowding in workplaces to a level that detriments user experience and office attendance. For those that cannot attain 80% utilisation during peak hours, there are opportunities for further optimisation. Occupiers must weigh up whether to recoup opportunity as a saving or reinvest in the space for more connection and collaboration as well as space for small meetings and focused work.
Before the pandemic, the difference between peak and average attendance during a typical day or week was within 10%. This gap has widened and created challenges around maintaining vibrancy on quiet days and the ability to recover and optimise space.
Figure 4. Office utilisation rates across portfolios
Note: N=122, option of “unsure” is not included.
Source: CBRE Research, July 2024.
Peak attendance rarely occurs on a Friday
CBRE’s analysis of change in utilisation during a week reveals peak utilisation in Asia Pacific (ex. mainland China) is concentrated in mid-week. In contrast, companies in mainland China most commonly reach peak office attendance on Mondays (40%). Attendance is then broadly consistent for the rest of the week, aligned with the common practice for a five-day working week.
Fridays are rarely a peak day, with only 2% of Asia Pacific respondents and 12% of mainland Chinese respondents considering Friday as a peak workday, as many staff prefer to work remotely on Fridays.
In response to “Friday Syndrome”, many firms are introducing initiatives to increase Friday office attendance to maintain vibrancy for those who choose to come in, with the hope that this boosts connection and experience and perhaps leads to increased turn up over time. Enforcement measures include global mandates and rule tightening, while incentives include enhanced office amenities and permitting staff to leave early on Fridays.
Figure 5. Which of the week is considered a peak day?
Note: N=122.
Source: CBRE Research, July 2024
Figure 6. Initiatives to boost Friday office attendance

Office attendance protocols are mostly at managers’ discretion
Office attendance policies and protocols in Asia Pacific have tightened significantly over the past two years. While 73% of companies have either implemented or are considering implementing attendance protocols, there is a lack of guidance from top management. More than one-third of respondents with office protocols rely solely on the discretion of their direct managers, while around one-quarter have no standard policies in place.
This loose implementation of office protocols poses a challenge for companies seeking to improve office attendance. Employers are advised to explore ways to encourage greater transparency in office attendance through providing clearer guidance and more consistent internal implementation.
Figure 7. Office protocol enforcement; Figure 8. Policy enforcement protocol if there is one
Note: N=70
Source: CBRE Research, July 2024